Why does the bad guy in Michael Flatley's Feet of Flames and Lord of the Dance always have epic pants? I think in Lord of the Dance he should be allowed to be Lord of the Pants. Its not Lord of the Dance, but he's still a lord of something. Also, right after the Lord of the Pants (yes that's what I'm calling him now) steals the belt to make him Lord of the Dance and the real Lord of the Dance comes back to life, the Lord of the Pants is at a total disadvantage! The Lord of the Dance is SHIRTLESS!!!! That distracts from any mistakes he made as well as distracting the opponent! So, all in all its a completely unfair fight. You might be thinking "Wouldn't epic pants be distracting, too?" and they are, but the Lord of the Dance has LEATHER pants which are equally distracting. This cancels out the distraction of both of their pants leaving only shirtlessness.
 |
| Don't even try to deny that you are distracted |
It is difficult to say whether or not he would still have won if he had been wearing a shirt, but it definitely had an effect on the outcome. As long as we remember the Lord of the Pants was at a disadvantage we can allow him to keep his dignity as well as realize a strategy that may have once worked in hand-to-hand combat.
No comments:
Post a Comment